Boston Globe Editorial Calls for Fewer Pap Smears
The Boston Globe believes that performing fewer pap smears would free up medical services and funds that could “be better utilized in other ways.” In today’s editorial, “Curb Unnecessary Pap Tests,” the Globe goes on to state that the pap smear need only be done once every three years for women who have had negative test results in years past and who haven’t had new sexual partners.
According to the Globe, an estimated 4,200 women will die of cervical cancer this year (that’s 11.5 women every day, in case you’re counting). Of these, “most cases are found in women who have never been screened, who have not been screened within five years, or who had an abnormal Pap test without subsequent follow-up.”
Hence, the end justifies the means: women don’t need to be tested annually.
But here’s the thing: physicians do a whole lot more than simply scrape some cells off the cervix for a peep under the microscope. They feel for tumors and cysts in the ovaries, rectum and other areas. They check a woman’s breasts and thyroid as well as check for and ask questions about STDs.
And, they ask lots of questions: experiencing any pain during sex? night sweats? frequent urination? Are you planning on having more children? What’s your method of birth control and how is that working for you? How many partners do you have?
In fact, a woman we know learned she had ovarian cyst due to her doctor finding it during her annual pap — something that scared her to death as two women in her family had died of ovarian cancer. She subsequently had her ovary and fallopian tube removed (and also went on to have two children).
The pap smear, in other words, is the only time when women get undivided attention about their **reproductive** health — and cutting this “unnecessary” exam to once every three to five years is wrong, wrong, wrong.
What do you think? Do you agree or disagree with the Globe editorial?








